Hiring Criminal Defence Solicitors in London

LONDON THE OLD BAILEY_85

Unless you have been charged with a criminal offence in the past, you probably have very little idea of what you need to do to prepare for a court appearance and how much effective legal representation is likely to cost.

I was in this exact position when I was falsely accused of assault causing grievous bodily harm (GBH). The fact that GBH was involved meant that, were I to be found guilty of the charges, a prison sentence would be automatic. Faced with the prospect of spending up to 5 years in jail – or much longer if intent was proved – for something I did not do, I naturally panicked and considered all sorts of ridiculous solutions.

These ranged from confronting the person who made the accusations to fleeing the country and starting a new life overseas. I can see now that pursuing either of these two options would have been incredibly stupid but at the time, common sense was in short supply as far my mind was concerned.

Finding a Good Criminal Solicitor in London

I was fortunate in that I was able to engage the services of a first-class legal expert, who advised me to take the more sensible option of sticking around and fighting the charges, and I would like to let others who may find themselves in the same situation know what they need to consider when looking for legal representation.

  1. Cost – The good news for those who simply do not have the money available to spend on experienced legal experts is that legal aid is available for most criminal cases that are tried in England & Wales. This was a huge weight off my mind as, although I earn a reasonable wage and was not claiming any benefits at the time, I certainly didn’t have the financial resources to fund a lengthy court case. For those who are in receipt of benefits, legal aid is often provided completely free of charge.
  1. Experience – Just because you are relying on legal aid to fund your case, it does not mean that you have to settle for second best as far as legal representation is concerned. Whatever your financial status, you should make sure that any firm of solicitors you approach, whether in London or elsewhere, has plenty of experience of dealing with criminal cases similar to yours.
  1. Location – Whilst much can be done over the phone and the Internet these days, you are going to want to have face-to-face meetings with the criminal solicitor in London who is representing you so make sure that you choose one in an easy-to-reach location.

The three factors above are those I personally found to be the most important but there are of course others that you will need to take into account. One thing that I found worked in my favour was the fact that my solicitor believed in my innocence from the very start and was easy to get along with. If this is not the case for you initially, it is well worth looking elsewhere for legal assistance.

GMC Proposes Cooling Off Period for Cosmetic Surgery Patients

Online PR News – 11-August-2015 – The frequency with which people are encountering problems when undergoing cosmetic surgery has led the General Medical Council to move to issue new guidance proposing a cooling off period before any surgical procedures are carried out on patients. The GMC chairman, Professor Terence Stephenson, said: “Cosmetic practice is a huge and expanding area of medicine and patients, some of whom are vulnerable, do need to be better protected. We are producing this guidance because of the risks around this area of medicine.”

ls

The main issue that the GMC is seeking to address is cases where patients feel they were put under pressure to make a decision about cosmetic surgery, which they later regretted. Professor Stephenson went on to say: “We are clear that doctors must not pressure patients to make rushed decisions they may end up regretting and they must give them enough information so they can make an informed choice.”

According to some patients, there are clinics in the country that are quite happy to carry out procedures on a first visit to their facility and will even encourage people to do so. Nathan Thursfield, a 20-year-old Katie Price fan living in Staffordshire, is one such patient. Having spent roughly £50,000 on cosmetic procedures in the last couple of years, he said, “”I think a cooling off period is a good idea and I would like to see it come in. For my personal preference I know what I want and I go for it. I can be impulsive so I don’t like to wait but cosmetic surgery is something that needs to be thought about.” A botched Botox job that has left him with lumps in his forehead whenever he frowns and lumps in his lips has led Nathan to be a little more circumspect with regard to cosmetic surgery than some of his peers.

The guidelines that the GMC wishes cosmetic surgery clinics to follow are due to be published early in 2016 and will hopefully ensure that other people who are perhaps a little over enthusiastic when it comes to changing their appearance through cosmetic procedures will be given the necessary time to consider all of the available options carefully before going under the knife.

Many industry professionals are only too aware of the need for a cooling off period and already incorporate one into their code of practice. The director of a beauty spa in the West Midlands that offers Botox treatments said they always arranged for patients to have a consultation with their doctor at least 2 weeks before the proposed date of the procedure.

For anybody that has been pressured into undergoing cosmetic surgery and subsequently had reason to regret their decision, it may be possible to take legal action against the clinic in question. You can find further information on how to make a claim for clinical negligence on the websites of personal injury specialists such as http://oraclesolicitors.co.uk. Initial consultations are free with many such solicitors.

Terrorism: High Court guidelines review will be faced by Charity Payment over Crate financing

The High-Court has dominated a judicial evaluation will be faced by the Charity Payment following the Percentage chose to stress charities into not financing Crate, a that promises to become “trying to enable neighborhoods influenced by the Battle on Terror”.

It’s believed the Fee forced after Crate explained the intelligence solutions, probable radicalised Mohammed Emwazi, additionally referred to as Jihadi David of the State financing to reduce.

Crate, which itself isn’t a charity, think the steps of the Fee overstepped its forces underneath the Charity Work 2011 like a charity regulator.

The High-Court recently decided that Crate started procedures to get a judicial overview of the Charity Commission’s choice and so had an incident. Lord Justice Burnett given the evaluation to continue.

Zoe Nicola, a focusing on account of Crate, said of the judgment: “We’re thankful towards the courtroom for allowing authorization to follow the judicial evaluation from the Charity Payment, about the foundation that there is an arguable case that they served beyond their legal forces in seeking guarantees that, essentially, avoided the supply of potential charitable financing to Crate.”

After he branded the Charity an extremist company throughout a talk this week he produced in Manchester crate may also possibly be starting a legitimate assault on David Cameron.

“I do want to declare anything towards Students’ National Unification,” explained Cameron in his talk. “whenever you decide to ally yourselves by having an company like Crate, which called Jihadi Steve a ‘stunning child’ and informed individuals to ‘help the jihad’ in Iraq and Afghanistan, it surely does, for me, waste your company as well as your respectable background of campaigning for justice.”

Crate has responded by saying they’re not correct. Dr Adnan Siddiqui, the representative of Crate, stated the “serious attempts to demonise Crate are detrimental and also the governmentis counter terrorism technique is “started on the combative, securistised strategy that’ll boost the change of politically motivated assault, in the place of counter it.

“Crate is taking actions to challenge this tactic to be challenged by this actions, as maligning people may harm initiatives produced by numerous parts of society to search to conditions that influence all culture for methods.”

Presently it’s unsure whether a cost of defamation might be levelled in the Prime Minister.

Source: The Guardian

Law Home Secretary to launch into police custody deaths

The House Secretary Theresa May has introduced she’ll start a completely independent overview of fatalities happening during police custody.

May may state in a talk that’ll be provided later today the evaluation is definitely a try to enhance the public rely upon law enforcement, that has lost soil because of the fatalities which have happened while individuals have experienced police custody or in touch with the police in different ways.

The evaluation is considered to particularly consider how those whom are kept by during custody are restrained by the authorities.solicitors

The concentrate on discipline uses the Separate Authorities Complains Fee (IPCC) launched a higher degree of complaint within the authorities offering obvious explanations why these in custody have died, in addition to an annual statement on fatalities occurring during or subsequent authorities contact.

The IPCC document claims that there have been 17 fatalities while everyone was in one deadly shooting in addition to police custody because of police activity.

The statement also documents 69 people committed suicide subsequent being in police custody and also the IPCC is examining another 41 fatalities where these whom have perished subsequent connection with authorities to get a number of factors, including one s were issues were elevated by people who died using the authorities regarding their security.

Lastly, fatalities have been outlined by the numbers where mentalhealth and weakness is a component.

The seat Dame Anne Owers, of the IPCC, has stated of the numbers: ” specific problems are faced by law enforcement in working with people that are emotionally sick, or underneath the impact of medicines or booze…

” One of the most significant capabilities of the IPCC would be to examine fatalities in or subsequent to ensure that classes are discovered police custody and potential fatalities avoided whenever we can. It’s required for the groups of people who died they determine and understand exactly why and what happened.

“Unfortunately, our inspections have also frequently uncovered exactly the same issues: insufficient risk-assessment; symbol inspections on the person in custody; inadequate handovers between custody team; failing to determine or precisely cope with individuals with emotional health problems or drug abuse issues; bad contact between authorities along with other companies.”

Nevertheless, some have experienced the evaluation as only a publicity stop from the government. Deborah Coles, of the charity Inquest, stated: ” It’s too soon to inform if this really is more of a public relations workout than a genuine try to produce the required responsibility of cops and also effective change.”

Source: IPCC and The Parent

Law Home Secretary to launch into police custody deaths

solicitor blogThe House Secretary Theresa May has introduced she’ll start a completely independent overview of fatalities happening during police custody.

May may state in a talk that’ll be provided later today the evaluation is definitely a try to enhance the public rely upon law enforcement, that has lost soil because of the fatalities which have happened while individuals have experienced police custody or in touch with the police in different ways.

The evaluation is considered to particularly consider how those whom are kept by during custody are restrained by the authorities.

The concentrate on discipline uses the Separate Authorities Complains Fee (IPCC) launched a higher degree of complaint within the authorities offering obvious explanations why these in custody have died, in addition to an annual statement on fatalities occurring during or subsequent authorities contact.

The IPCC document claims that there have been 17 fatalities while everyone was in one deadly shooting in addition to police custody because of police activity.

The statement also documents 69 people committed suicide subsequent being in police custody and also the IPCC is examining another 41 fatalities where these whom have perished subsequent connection with authorities to get a number of factors, including one s were issues were elevated by people who died using the authorities regarding their security.

Lastly, fatalities have been outlined by the numbers where mentalhealth and weakness is a component.

The seat Dame Anne Owers, of the IPCC, has stated of the numbers: ” specific problems are faced by law enforcement in working with people that are emotionally sick, or underneath the impact of medicines or booze…

” One of the most significant capabilities of the IPCC would be to examine fatalities in or subsequent to ensure that classes are discovered police custody and potential fatalities avoided whenever we can. It’s required for the groups of people who died they determine and understand exactly why and what happened.

“Unfortunately, our inspections have also frequently uncovered exactly the same issues: insufficient risk-assessment; symbol inspections on the person in custody; inadequate handovers between custody team; failing to determine or precisely cope with individuals with emotional health problems or drug abuse issues; bad contact between authorities along with other companies.”

Nevertheless, some have experienced the evaluation as only a publicity stop from the government. Deborah Coles, of the charity Inquest, stated: ” It’s too soon to inform if this really is more of a public relations workout than the usual genuine try to produce the required responsibility of cops and also effective change.”

Source: IPCC and The Parent